番茄社区

The following column by Danny Seiden originally appeared on on August 15, 2023. Seiden was responding to that appeared in the same publication on August 4. 

A recent published in Foreign Policy arguing against corporate investment in Arizona completely misses the mark. Not only does it misstate the facts, but it also dismisses Arizona鈥檚 decades of success advancing sustainable growth while ignoring the many climate challenges present in other states.

Arizona is one of the leading states fueling the United States鈥� advanced manufacturing resurgence. Many of the world鈥檚 most innovative companies have chosen to invest here, including Intel, TSMC, LG Energy Solution, Virgin Galactic, Proctor and Gamble, American Battery Factory, Northrop Grumman, Insight Enterprises, Benchmark Electronics, Leonardo, , Gulfstream Aerospace, and Fujifilm Electronic Materials. All of these firms have expanded their operations in Arizona鈥攁nd that鈥檚 just in the last two years.

These companies value Arizona鈥檚 many competitive advantages, such as our rapidly growing skilled labor force, top-notch universities and community colleges, , and a . They鈥檙e also betting on Arizona鈥檚 long-term vitality, and they鈥檙e right to do so.

For decades, Arizona has embraced a forward-thinking approach to conserving its most precious resource鈥攚ater鈥攁nd securing its long-term future. In fact, many of the world-class conservation efforts being implemented elsewhere as emergency measures were established in Arizona decades ago as a way of life.

Arizona鈥檚 landmark 1980 Groundwater Management Act restricted irrigation on new farmland, established 鈥渁ctive management areas鈥� covering the state鈥檚 fastest-growing metropolitan areas, and implemented a 100-year assured water supply requirement for builders. It took over three decades for California to follow suit and pass its own groundwater management act.

While the authors sought to exploit Arizona鈥檚 proactive water planning as a vulnerability, a closer examination of the facts reveals this area to be a strength, not a weakness.

For example, in June, the Arizona Department of Water Resources its latest 100-year groundwater model for the Phoenix area. The model, and Arizona鈥檚 Assured Water Supply program, represent national best practices for water stewardship, guaranteeing for Arizona homeowners and businesses that their water exists far into the future.

The latest Phoenix groundwater model shows the high-growth area meets 96 percent of groundwater demands for the coming century鈥攖hrough 2121鈥攁 testament to the state鈥檚 far-sighted stewardship. Making up the 4 percent deficit is achievable when you consider Arizona uses , with more than the economy as measured by gross domestic income growth.

Contrary to what the authors wrote, the new model has not frozen new housing construction in the Phoenix area. In fact, the region has more than 80,000 new houses in the for which water certificates have been issued. Likewise, 15 entities in the Phoenix region, including the largest cities and towns, have already obtained a and are not impacted by the update.

Ongoing efforts to increase efficiency, conservation, reuse, and augmentation will lead to even greater water stewardship results.

Arizona鈥檚 industry leaders are key partners in water conservation efforts. Intel鈥檚 Arizona operations, which include four fabs and two more under construction, have been nationally for water stewardship, conserving more than 3 billion gallons last year. Intel鈥檚 12-acre onsite water reclamation facility at its Ocotillo campus in Chandler, Arizona, treats more than 9 million gallons of water a day, enabling its four fabs and counting to reuse water constantly within its systems.

Likewise, TSMC, which announced a $40 billion investment to build two high-tech fabs in the state, is in the planning stage of an onsite water reclamation plant, enabling its Arizona operations to achieve near-zero liquid discharge.

While attacking Arizona as uniquely vulnerable to climate change, the authors conveniently ignored challenges being experienced elsewhere in the United States. Take, for example, extreme weather events.

According to , weather-related power outages have increased dramatically over the past two decades, caused primarily by winter blizzards, tropical cyclones, and severe weather. States in the Southeast, Midwest, and Northeast experienced the greatest number of outages caused by extreme weather events.

These outages carry tremendous costs for businesses and residents alike. An energy industry found that, for the years 2020 and 2021, extreme storms and subsequent power outages in Michigan resulted in a nearly $5 billion economic loss. Similarly, when winter storms knocked out Texas鈥檚 energy grid in 2021, the local utility cut electricity to local semiconductor factories. As a result, companies like NXP, Infineon, and Samsung lasting weeks, costing tens of millions of dollars.

Arizona鈥檚 energy grid, in contrast, is ranked among the top two most reliable in the country by . The state is one of only nine mainland U.S. states with fewer than five weather-related major power outages from 2000 to 2021, demonstrating its resilient energy grid as well as a relative lack of natural disasters affecting other regions.

The authors sought to disparage Arizona on another point: its workforce. In doing so, they offered up other states as suggested alternatives, namely Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and New York. This baffling argument defies logic鈥攁nd data. Arizona is a skilled talent super-magnet. The other states? Not so much.

To begin with, Maricopa County, which encompasses the Phoenix area and is home to roughly 4.5 million people, is ranked the No. 1 county for talent attraction by , and has held that spot five out of the last six years. The county added the in the country between July 1, 2021 and July 1, 2022.

Statewide, , Arizona grew at a rate of 2.9 percent and added 207,690 residents. Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and New York? They all lost people, including in the hundreds of thousands for Illinois and New York.

Arizona鈥檚 population gains are driven by young, educated workers. According to , between 2016 and 2021, the Phoenix area saw 32 percent growth in residents in their 30s with college degrees, the third-best in North America, and 28 percent growth of residents in their 20s with a college degree, the fifth-best in North America. Statewide, between 2017 and 2021, Arizona saw the in educational attainment, a metric that measures the number of adults over 25 with at least an associate degree.

Comparing semiconductor workforces, the combined total semiconductor workforces of New York, Ohio, Michigan, and Illinois barely amount to half of Arizona鈥檚 .

It is true that TSMC recently announced a six-month delay to production in Phoenix. Moderate delays are neither unusual nor unexpected for industry projects of this scale, especially when considering TSMC鈥檚 Phoenix fabs will North America鈥檚 most advanced semiconductor technology in mass production, the kind that isn鈥檛 housed anywhere else in the United States.

Reasons for this delay have been grossly misconstrued by the authors. , the company鈥檚 highly advanced Arizona operations already support more than 2,200 employees on-site as well as over 12,000 local construction workers. The need for additional expertise relates narrowly to specialized equipment installers for TSMC鈥檚 3- and 4-nanometer fabrication machines, which are mainly in use in only one place in the world: Taiwan. The primary job of these Taiwan-based installers will be to train, coach, and mentor the workforce on the ground, not replace U.S. workers.

To extend this isolated labor issue to broadly attack Arizona鈥檚 nation-leading talent attraction record is inaccurate and unfair in the extreme.

When comparing actual data and facts, it鈥檚 clear that Arizona still offers a superior investment environment. That would explain why so many of the world鈥檚 leading technology companies are choosing it as a location to expand.

Danny Seiden is the president and CEO of the Arizona 番茄社区 of Commerce & Industry